When there was a hearing for this issue in 1949, the pair had a run in, when Oppenheimer appeared to be mocking Strauss on the stand, which was apparently “a humiliation which Strauss would not forget.” The same year, the General Advisory Committee (GAC) of senior atomic scientists questioned Strauss over whether exporting radioisotopes for medical purposes was risking U.S. Straussby Richard Pfau: “Oppenheimer subsequently was a leading opponent of moving ahead with the hydrogen bomb and proposed a national security strategy based on atomic weapons and continental defence Strauss wanted the development of thermonuclear weapons and a doctrine of deterrence…Oppenheimer supported a policy of openness regarding the numbers and capabilities of the atomic weapons in America's arsenal Strauss believed that such unilateral frankness would benefit no one but Soviet military planners.” According to No Sacrifice Too Great: The Life of Lewis L. In 1947, Strauss and Oppenheimer had already crossed paths, when Oppenheimer was heading up the Los Alamos laboratory, and Strauss then offered him a job as director at Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton University.īut the two men clashed on opinions. We should now make an intensive effort to get ahead with the super.” What Was Lewis Strauss's Relationship With J. Strauss argued vigorously for a crash program to build a hydrogen bomb and is quoted as saying: “The time has now come for a quantum jump in our planning. should prioritize the advancements of nuclear weapons and how the information should be kept secret from other nations. After the Trinity nuclear bomb test in July 1945, the Soviet Union tested its first atomic bomb in 1949, and Strauss was vocal in how the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |